Archive for the ‘NHL’ Category


The Canucks new logo speculation continues

Thursday, July 26th, 2007

Tossing even more fuel towards the flames, I thought I would chime in with the always interesting discussion about the new Canucks logo and jerseys that are going to be announced in the coming weeks. This I know based on what VP Chris Zimmerman said at the state of the franchise I attended with J.J.

canucks-bwg-logo.jpg Speaking of, J.J. posted the other day with the scoop, and Alanah chimed in with some thoughts about it today. Being that I get a lot of Google searches on this topic, Canucks fans will be interested to see and hear this one.

It was a reader who emailed this into J.J., so no one can be sure on its authenticity. However, as mentioned in his post, these colors within the logo match the current color scheme on Canucks.com. Does that mean anything? No one really knows.

My opinion, it’s not too horrible, but I’d still prefer the stick-in-rink. Otherwise, this isn’t too bad, especially if you consider what Buffalo changed to last season. At least this looks a little more menacing compare to that slug.

Filed under: Canucks, Hockey, NHL

What I would like to see from the NHL

Tuesday, July 10th, 2007

Going back to my post about attending the state of the Canucks franchise with J.J., I thought I would hit a few points that stuck out to me. More so, it’s something that a lot of hockey minded folks, from broadcasters to fans, have been talking about. It was the opening panel that inspires me to mention a few of the following topics.

Getting set for the panel discussion

I can’t remember who said it, but the basic jest was that we, the fans, need to speak up about what we want from the things we enjoy and love. Truly, that can go for anything you follow, sports related or not, and the truth is that fans make things like the NHL exist.

Speaking of a lack of fans making things not exist, look at the Nashville Predators. Great team, horrible fan base, and a relocation of the franchise is constant soap opera. There are about four locations being tossed around: Las Vegas, NV, Kansas City, MO, Hamilton, ON, and Winnipeg, MB. Basically, the southwest desert, midwest U.S., hockey saturated Ontario, and a return of the NHL to the Canadian prairie.

I’ve stated my feelings about KC before, even though that was about the Penguins who are staying in Pittsburgh, and I still stand by what I said. However, I will add that if the Predators are going to relocate within the U.S., then it should be to KC, not Las Vegas. Another Canadian team is something I am all in support of, but not in Ontario. Return it to Winnipeg where people are hockey lovers, and it’s a well known fact that all the Canadian teams in the NHL are making a large bulk of profits for the entire league. It just makes better business sense to move the team where hockey is loved and will make a hell of a lot more money than the desert.

If you move a team to Las Vegas, you’ll have to spend a lot of marketing dollars on teaching fans that the team exists on top of teaching the game. At least if you move the team to Kansas City, the team will be closer to the 49th parallel where hockey is more prevalent. Another team in the desert, where there is never enough ice to even skate on, is a ridiculous move.

Speaking of ridiculous, kill the television contract with Versus. Nuke it. Rip it up. There are way too many people who have a hard enough time getting NHL coverage in the U.S. with the way it stands, so something needs to change. There are those who can’t even get the network, so why would you invest in something that has lackluster exposure?

A little side note, but an interesting one, the annual Iowa vs. Iowa State football game will be on Versus this year, opposed to one of the major broadcast networks or ESPN. That even has a few people asking questions about what a Versus actually is. Being the good Hawkeye fan that I am, that article made me laugh as well as sad.

Anyway, I have liked the NBC deal thus far, and it’s even better with Brett Hull leaving to take a job with the Dallas Stars. I don’t like them leaving a game early because a game runs long, especially for a horse race that has one hour pre-show for a two minute event. I can’t think of a better way to turn off a new fan who discovers hockey in the midst of the Stanley Cup playoffs, much like I did in my early teens.

Lastly (because I know you’re listening, NHL), take a long, hard look at what the New York Islanders are doing with allowing bloggers access to their franchise. Not only am I a huge fan of this, but this is a remarkable step in allowing those who love their team to report on their team. It’s true that this has its good and bad qualities to it, but there is a lot of difference between sports reporting (i.e. radio or newspaper) and sports blogging.

Canucks Open Practice
Recording a podcast episode of The Crazy Canucks from the press box in GM Place.
(Photo credit: Miss604 on Flickr)

In blogging, and podcasting for that matter, we brew a community. We have comments, interaction, and other people blog what someone else blogs about. It’s a world wide conversation, and we’re talking hockey on a scale that is much different than what sports reporters do in press or behind the desk or mic. We’re not bound by deadlines or schedules, but there is precedence on being honest about what you love, which is your hockey team. True that this can be biased, but people write what they are passionate about. That’s blogging, and they post views about the team they are the fans of, expanding and strengthening the team and league around the world.

The NHL should make more of an effort to expand this concept throughout the league. Want examples of how much blogging benefits a team like the Canucks? Check out J.J., Alanah, or Zanstorm. They are fans, but they offer news, viewpoints, and a unique voice that speak to people more than a sports reporter might. At least I know that I can count on all of those folks to translate league news into something I can readily understand.

Those are the big issues for me right now, and I know that there are more that will creep up later. I’ll try to post about them when I think of them. If you have something to say, then post it in the comments. Better yet, get your voice out there, too. Who knows if we can change anything in the end, but speaking up is a start.

Zamboni-ing under the influence

Tuesday, April 3rd, 2007

I’ve seen this on numerous news sites, not to mention the various hockey blogs that I follow. There is just no way that I can pass this one up. And mind you, this did not happen in Canada.

NEWARK, New Jersey (AP) — It’s not drunken driving in New Jersey if it involves a Zamboni.

A judge ruled the four-ton ice rink-grooming machines aren’t motor vehicles because they aren’t useable on highways and can’t carry passengers.

Zamboni operator John Peragallo had been charged with drunken driving in 2005 after a fellow employee at the Mennen Sports Arena in Morristown, New Jersey, told police the machine was speeding and nearly crashed into the boards.

Police said Peragallo’s blood alcohol level was 0.12 percent. A level of 0.08 is considered legally drunk in New Jersey. [cnn]

Fortunately, no mascots were hurt in this incident. I have to add that the blame mostly resides on the “Sambuca with his breakfast coffee and two Valium-pills before work”, thanks to Bradley for picking that one out. But seriously, need I say more?

Filed under: Buh?, NHL

Why hockey isn’t bigger in the U.S.

Sunday, March 11th, 2007

Totally stealing this one from J.J.

I am convinced that the only way that hockey is to grow in the U.S. is by instilling a love for the game with the younger crowd. In fact, let me translate this video clip for said folks who live in this said country. She is taking a cue for her, I assume, father that when he says the first name of the player on the Canucks, the little girl responds with the last name of the player. And she’s probably two or three?

Changing rules or scheming marketing plans don’t lure long term fans to a sport, or anything for that matter. Most Canadian fans will tell you that hockey is something they grew up with, and that’s why they are so passionate about it. And even if they’re not living and breathing it, they might still have a fondness for it. And if you think that’s stupid, then ask someone from Mexico as to why anyone would find futbol, aka soccer, interesting.

Filed under: Canucks, Hockey, NHL, YouTube

Possible new Canucks jersey?

Saturday, February 24th, 2007

New Canucks UniformsThis could be completely false information, but it’s worth passing on for the sake of finding out if it is or not. An email came in to The Crazy Canucks about what showed up into this guy’s email. Based on this post by J.J. earlier today, I can’t say that I’m too surprised, and it fits with what I said about the new NHL uniforms coming about next season[post]. Still, are Canucks fans ready for the return of the stink-in-rink and Johnny Canuck?

Rebecca has a take on it, but we’ve been talking it over without really any conclusion of what we feel about it. Alanah put something on Kukla’s as well, so let the jury call the verdict. Is Buzz a victim or bringer of truth? You decide.

Update: Check out the comments in Alanah’s post. It appears that these are some mock ups created by a Canucks fan. Can’t say I blame them, but I figured I’d pass on the rumor for the sake of finding out for sure. Internets, you did your job.

Update – June 4, 2007: The jerseys are going to change.

Update – August 21, 2007: The jerseys are here on August 29, 2007

Update – August 29, 2007: The new jerseys are here!

Bettman is sticking around

Thursday, February 8th, 2007

This is incredibly depressing. I never thought I would find myself to be the type of hockey fan that becomes interested in the realm of the business behind the NHL, but it’s tough to stay outside of something you enjoy so much. The fact that NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman[wiki] is having his contract extended is like nails on a chalkboard.

There is nothing that the guy says that makes you feel safe about the future of the league. He could call me up to say that I have season tickets to all NHL games for life, and I’d still be honked off. Maybe it’s that he’s annoying, but I tend to think it’s some bad business on his end.

VANCOUVER, British Columbia — Gary Bettman says he isn’t leaving his job as NHL commissioner anytime soon.

“I’ve watched with fascination some of the newspaper reports having me going on sabbatical shortly,” Bettman said Wednesday night. “That isn’t the case, wasn’t the case.

“I think people were somehow under the impression my contract had a year to run and got fixated on that. Those stories were, to say the least, inaccurate.”

Bettman’s contract runs through the 2010-11 season. It runs parallel with the collective bargaining agreement between the NHL and its players union that resolved the labor fight that cost the NHL its 2004-05 season.

There have been reports some owners are losing patience with Bettman. Some others are frustrated with the current U.S. broadcast contract with Versus, a cable network formerly known as the Outdoor Life Network, that is unknown to many people. Others are upset with the current unbalanced NHL schedule, which means some superstars don’t play in certain markets for three years.

In a meeting with reporters, Bettman defended the NHL’s contract with Versus and said the NHL will change when owners can agree on a solution that “makes sense to everybody,” The Canadian Press reported.

The CP reported Bettman said he is confident that Versus can grow hockey in the U.S. over the long haul, noting that the network is now seen in 72 million households, up from 64 million. [espn]

How can you build hockey in the states when you push the games on a network that not very many people have and is new to a lot of people’s vocabulary? How much more on the back burner can you get? Just because the network can be seen, that doesn’t mean people are going to watch.

I had some hopes that the Bettman era was coming to a close. He isn’t the only guy pulling the strings here, but nothing completely changes unless he wants it to. The schedule, rules, and TV coverage. I’m not a genius when it comes to the world of sports business, but it’s not too much of a stretch to say that things have been for the better, especially for hockey in the U.S.

Filed under: Hockey, NHL

NHL refs are getting makeovers as well

Thursday, January 25th, 2007

Ok, I’ve come to like the new uniforms that the players will be wearing next season, as long as the designs that are applied to them are not gaudy. Trust me, I’m going to hold my breath until then. Just got a bad feeling that some teams (I’m looking at you Nashville!) will go a tad overboard.

This, however, is something I didn’t notice at the All-Star Game last night.

While most of the uniform-based attention at the NHL All-Star Game was focused on the players’ new Reebok-designed attire, another uniform story went largely unheralded and unnoticed.

Referees were wearing silver armbands, instead of their usual orange, and ESPN.com has learned that this change will be made permanent next season.

“It’s coming for next season,” NHL spokesperson Nirva Milord said in an e-mail from the All-Star Game in Dallas. “We’re just giving it a consistent look with the new NHL logo.”

That logo, introduced prior to the 2005-06 season, is black and silver, while the league’s previous emblem was black and orange, matching the refs’ current armbands. [espn]

No!!! This is a change that I do not care for, and it completely kills an idea that Rebecca and I had for Halloween costumes.

McGeoughI like the orange bands, if not for look, but for function. When the ref raises his arm to call a penalty, it’s more noticeable to catch the movement. The little, orange floaties are the first thing I think of when it comes to a hockey ref. At the same time, the effects won’t be nearly as good when McGeough comes flying in to call a no-goal and appear to be ready to fly away because he’s flapping his arms like a mad man.

As a side note, check out this post to see how GZ Expat would change the NHL even further. If you saw the interview with Gary Bettman[wiki] on the CBC’s coverage of the All-Star Game last night, then, like me, you will feel like absolutely nothing is safe in the NHL anymore. He now embodies everything I can think of when it comes to slimy businessmen.

Filed under: Hockey, News Item, NHL

The NHL 2.0

Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007
montreal canadian allstar
Photo credit: Love the 214 on Flickr

I know that I am not the first one to call “The New NHL” by something so geeky. Look at everything that is going on in the NHL right now, in addition to the revamped rules in this post-lockout era. It’s faster and way more competitive than before. Okay, I think all hockey fans can be in agreement on that one, right?

Then there is the Buffalo Sabres‘ new logo, aka The Buffaslug. I already gave my opinion on it when it was unveiled, and it still doesn’t sit well with me. When I think about it in relation to everything else going on in the world of Web 2.0[wiki], there is this nagging comparison that I’ve been wanting to make. However, one team making a change isn’t enough, but check out this post that examines Web 2.0 logos in general.

Enter the new uniforms that will take over the league next season[rbkedgeuniform.com]. Lighter, water resistant, aerodynamic, and Sidney Crosby approved. That last point can really be ignored, but I know for a fact that there are going to be loads of people who will be saddened, if not pissed, by this change.

These are not what you can consider sweaters anymore. They are jerseys, and all this new technology that goes into them makes them uber expensive. Of course, they’re still brand spanking new, but $300 for a jersey? No thanks.

teemu selanne
Photo credit: Love the 214 on Flickr

Tighter fit also means less real estate to paste a logo on the front of your jersey. So if you resize and lose detail, might this be a good time to rethink your logo altogether? That might be pushing it, but what better reason to make a change when everything else a player puts on is changing anyway? Remember, this isn’t just about the jersey as much as it is about pants and socks, too(better hip protection and no more tape). Could next season be the year the “stick in rink”[hockeydb] comes back to replace the Orca Bay logo[hockeydb] for the Canucks? I wouldn’t be surprised, and the change is something I would fully support as long as it looks good with those new threads.

One thing that sticks out to me is the similarity to baseball jerseys around the hips. The way that the front and back dip down will ultimately change the way long time fans think about the traditional sweater. To me, those curves would make it hard to do that horizontal line at the bottom of the jersey. Perhaps when we see them next season, it will be a straight cut across. However, I kind of doubt it. The league is sounding pretty harsh on the topic, and there is threat of fining players next season if they make individual adjustments. I’ve also heard that the third jersey might go away completely and teams will have to wear white when playing in their home rink.

Alex Ovechkin
Photo credit: julie_h on Flickr

This is why I’m starting to call this the NHL 2.0. New rules, new wardrobe, and a lot of new faces are changing the way the game is played. Just look at the All-Star Game and how many people are going for their first time, not to mention how young a lot of them are.

However, to any team that is going to start changing logos, I pray that they avoid the mindset that has given rise to the Buffaslug. If there is any comparison to the world of Web 2.0 going on here, this is one design concept that I do not want to see when it comes to forging new logos. This is where I have to plead for staying as traditional as possible, however strange that might sound or actually end up being.

I’m okay with change. I am not okay with something that makes me think of Hello Kitty.

Filed under: Canucks, Hockey, NHL